$250,000 combined is NOT rich

Honest question, why is it acceptable to MANY to penalizing people who have busted rear-ends to become higher earners?  I’m seeing too many comment that they are okay with couples who earn $250,000 a year or more, have their taxes raised, but not on the “middle class.”  Earning a higher wage is not automatic.  Many people who earn this combined income have given up time with family for years, invested tons of money on higher degrees, taken high risk jobs, take high travel positions, moved to where the job is, and more, to earn what they do now. Many people who earn this combined income are now in their 40’s, 50’s and 60’s, which are higher earning income years and are now able to start paying off debts and saving for their retirements.

I’m sorry, but yes, it looks like the government, that we elected, is not capable of actually cutting spending immediately, and so taxes will have to be raised, if we want to reduce our debt. In my personal opinion, it should be across the board, or not at all. The penalizing of people who have worked for years to gain higher incomes, the people who take the high risk/high reward jobs, the people who risked it all to start a business, and more, is simply wrong.

Why?

The top 1 percent of income earners, $344,000+ per year, paid 36.73 percent of all federal income taxes in 2009.
The top 5 percent of income earners, $154-$344,000 per year, paid 21.93 percent of all federal income taxes in 2009.

So, 5 percent of Americans paid 58.66 percent of all federal income taxes in 2009.

You want to raise taxes on the 1 and 2 percent income earners who already pay a higher percentage than others and obviously do pay their fair share, then raise them on everyone, even the bottom 50 percent should have some skin in the game to understand how our system works and that there is “NO FREE” – someone pays for it.

If you don’t have an income to pay taxes and are receiving any kind of Federal funded benefits, you should have a number of mandatory hours that you work to receive your benefits to cover what you would pay. (Remember, individuals who receive S.S. do pay Federal income taxes) It’s a simple equation, value of benefits received is equal to annual compensation, adjusted estimated benefit compensation times tax rate, taxes owed divided by minimum wage or comparable wage for duties performed, equals hours of work due to the Federal Government.  There are a lot of services provided by the Federal government that could be done by “benefit” receivers, providing additional Federal savings.

And by the way, a combined income of $250,000. a year, is NOT rich.

Raise My Taxes…if

Dear Obama & Congress,

I’m happy to pay more taxes if you agree to a 4 to 1 ratio.

Example -
For every 5% in tax increases on anyone, you implement the following:

1:  5% across the board budget cut in EVERY Federal department, including the White House operations and vacations budget, effective when the tax increase begins. If any department says they can’t do it, the Head of that department is immediately fired. This isn’t a reduction that can be spread out over multiple years, it’s an immediate reduction in funding.

2:  5% reduction of staff in EVERY department, including the White House staff, effective when the tax increase begins.

3:  5% cut in pay, across the board for EVERY federal employee, including all serving in Congress and the POTUS, effective when the tax increase begins.

4:  5 “something for free” programs are ELIMINATED, effective when the tax increase begins, example – Obamaphones, ability to purchase “specialty/premium” items with EBT cards, etc.. You see, if you want to take more money from me, in which I will receive no additional benefit, those receiving money for doing nothing should also experience a reduction in benefits from the Federal Government.

No write offs or delayed cuts/savings can be taken, simple immediate cut in spending, effective for the upcoming year.

No using the reduction of staff savings to be applied to the 5% budget cut.

If the above takes place, then the taxes raised might actually start to be utilized to pay down the national deficit.

I haven’t seen ANY real ideas, from either side, that addresses both real cuts and “fair” tax increases, so I thought I’d give you an idea.

America is Resilient, Not Storm Proof

Many don’t realize the impact of the election; they assume, fear the worse or think oh well. Why? Because the majority of Americans have not taken the time to read the laws, understand exactly how our government works and depend on others opinions to form their own.  Many have not studied history and don’t believe what is happening in Greece, could ever happen in the United States. Is it a product of our “fast” and “must have it now” culture? I don’t know, but when you dumb down a population, the population will believe a well-delivered message.

Many will blame Mitt Romney and say he wasn’t conservative enough, wasn’t a good candidate, and more. However, nothing could be further from the truth. Mitt Romney did not let the “conservative” people down, they let him down.  Instead of educating themselves fully, instead of banning together immediately, instead of focusing on economic issues, conservatives were side line quarterbacking and all over the social issue map, dragging our candidate into the mud and forcing him to fight his way out.

We elected exactly what we have today in DC, a divided congress who won’t work together, a divisive President who believes in Executive Orders, and no new plans to fix the financial cliff we are about to drop off.  Compromise will be forced down the House of Representatives, whether you like it or not. Obamacare and all it’s warts will be fully implemented, with fatal impacts beginning in 2014.  The national debt will rise and our credit rating will drop again.  And yes, taxes are about to rise.

The rally cry should be and should have always been to demonstrate a more open party; a party focused just on economic issues, forcing the liberals to defend economic policy, not personal liberties. The focus on abortion should have been left to activists, again forcing the liberals to defend the economics of expanding women dependencies on government for their liberties, instead of personal choices.  I harped about this for over a year. Now we’ll see how our values and freedom of religious beliefs weather under the coming storm.

For those who left it all on the field, donated as much time, money and effort as possible, thank you! Regardless of the outcome, it has been an incredible year. I continue to be proud to have supported Mitt Romney, so please, do me and yourself a favor, don’t bash or side line quarterback him on my blog.

So buckle down the hatches and get back to work. Prepare for what is ahead. Balance your family budget; cut spending where you can, and save what you can…trust me, you will need it.

America is resilient, but it isn’t storm proof. The next four years will have dramatic ups and downs, be prepared.

Will NOT be Silenced

Fast & Furious, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, Benghazi

An American was killed on our border, hundreds of Mexican Citizens murdered, and we learn it was 100% caused by a program called “Fast & Furious”, a program Obama has claimed “Executive Privilege” to end an investigation and the media has ignored and refused to investigate.

An American Ambassador is murdered with three other men who served our nation in Benghazi, Libya. We learn security was denied and reduced before the 11th Anniversary of 9/11, even though two terrorist attacks had already been reported months before. We learn two former Navy Seals called in for back up and fought for seven hours before being murdered. Obama has blamed a video, given multiple false accounts, and now “takes offense” when asked for the truth. The media continues to ignore and refuses to investigate.

How much blood has to be shed under Obama for the media to do their job and demand answers for the families and for America?

Whether it is incompetence or deliberate, these two situations alone should be enough for every American to turn their backs on Obama and demand he and his administration be held responsible.

“Cool” and “Likable” isn’t Whitewashing of Americans being murdered.

America deserves better.

Kudos to Judge Jeanine for calling out the White House on Benghazi. Click here to watch! <==video
The Families of these Hero’s Deserve Answers and the Truth.
America Deserves Better

Crowley & Obama face off against Romney…and lose.

Journalistic integrity is all but DEAD. When journalists decide it is easier to talk and report on what has been given to them by a candidate and by an administration, instead of actually investigating and researching the facts, there is NO unbiased or truthful reporting. And the ones who love to hide behind “free speech” are the ones who are lazy participants of killing free speech.

Crowley LIED about Libya last night for Obama, she stopped Romney from discussing Fast & Furious right when he said Obama has claimed executive privilege, she stopped Romney from forcing Obama to admit he also has off-shore investments in his pension, she blocked Romney from exposing Obama’s lie about the auto bailout, and gave Obama extra time to sway off topic and attack Romney.  But hey, after the debate and after the world stopped watching, she admitted she was wrong about Libya and Romney was right when pressed by her colleague Anderson Cooper.  But hey, it should make liberals proud that Obama had to have a woman carry his water during the debate.
CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and even many on Fox might as well admit they are gossip reporters like the National Inquirer. But honestly, there is probably more truth in the National Inquirer now than many of these news networks.
Great Article to read, by William Bigelow on Breitbart.com  -
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/17/Crowley-interrupts-28-times-Romney
Candy Crowley, who was suspected of being one more liberal moderator in the tank for Barack Obama, was more than just in the tank for him; she dove in and sucked all the water out for him so he could pretend he walked on water.
In the first presidential debate, Jim Lehrer, no slouch at shilling for the Democratic Party, interrupted Mitt Romney 15 times and Barack Obama only five.
Crowley made Lehrer look like an amateur. She interrupted Obama nine times, (although four of those were when he wouldn’t respect the time limit when discussing assault weapons; he went over his time limit all night long), but when it came to Mitt Romney, she was utterly beyond the pale.
Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times. 28 times. Her desperation to keep Romney from scoring points was so patently obvious that it wasn’t really a surprise when she had her infamous moment: the moment when she interrupted and falsely claimed Romney was incorrect in accusing Obama of refusing to call the Benghazi attack an act of terror. And even beyond the interruptions, there were numerous instances where Crowley’s obvious partisanship prompted her to treat Romney with great disrespect:
1. She wouldn’t let him respond when Obama lied about the auto industry. First she called him Mr. Romney instead of governor, then protested, “there’ll be plenty of chances here to go on, but I want to… We have all these folks.  I will let you absolutely… OK. Will – will – you certainly will have lots of time here coming up.” Romney never did get the chance to respond.2. After the question asking whether gas prices as they stand now are the new normal, Obama got 2 chances to respond. When Romney asked for his second chance, Crowley shut him off by saying, “ … in the follow up, it doesn’t quite work like that. But I’m going to give you a chance here. I promise you, I’m going to.” She didn’t.3. When discussing how he would deal with deductions, just as Romney was about to destroy Obama with statistics, Crowley jumped in to save her man not only by denying the value of statistics, but changing the narrative to say Romney’s numbers couldn’t possibly add up:

“And Governor, let’s – before we get into a vast array of who says – what study says what, if it shouldn’t add up. If somehow when you get in there, there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in. If somehow the numbers don’t add up, would you be willing to look again …”

4. When Romney was trying to make a point of Obama’s pension investing in China, Crowley cut him off by insinuating people were tired of him talking:
“Governor Romney, you can make it short. See all these people? They’ve been waiting for you.  Make it short.”

Then she really tried to humiliate him with this: “If I could have you sit down, Governor Romney. Thank you.” She never asked Obama to sit down.

5. The infamous incident when she interrupted Romney’s claim about Obama’s refusal to call the Benghazi murders a terror attack:

“It – it – it – he did in fact, sir. So let me – let me call it an act of terror…

Prompted by Obama to say it a little louder, Crowley obliged:
“He – he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take – it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.”

6.  Just as egregiously, when the question was about assault weapons and Romney naturally started to discuss fast and furious, Crowley quickly shifted him away from that and turned it into an attack on Romney’s assault ban position:
“Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer banned. I know that you signed an assault weapons ban when you were in Massachusetts, obviously, with this question, you no longer do support that. Why is that, given the kind of violence that we see sometimes with these mass killings? Why is it that you have changed your mind?’

The fact that Obama escaped all night long by lie after lie didn’t seem to disturb Crowley in the slightest. She had her shadowy agenda, and she stuck to it fiercely. Now it is our job to throw her out into the sun where every American can see exactly how dirty she is.

Evan Sayet on Political Premise

It was a great night with Evan Sayet and the Romney Radio team last night.

If you missed it, click here to listen!  <==10/4/2012 Political Premise Show Link

Who is Evan Sayet? Evan is a political comedian and speaker.
Evan’s career is divided almost exactly down the middle, his time split between his political humor and his more serious lectures. About his comedy, Ann Coulter says “Who makes me laugh? Easy. Evan Sayet.” while Michael Barone of US News and World Report opines, “Evan has crossed that line from ‘funny to important.’”

His serious work includes “Regurgitating the Apple: How The Modern Liberal ‘Thinks,’” which he delivered to the Heritage Foundation.

Andrew Breitbart calls that talk “One of the five most important conservative speeches ever given.”

Evan’s book, “The Kindergarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks” came out this week!
For more on Evan and to buy his book, visit www.evansayet.com