When Republicans Go Wrong

The state of Georgia is one of only three states in the country that bans the sales of beer, wine and liquor on Sundays.  For years now Georgia has been working on legislation to allow the voters the ability to have local control, meaning the voter can vote at the county level to determine if their county will allow the sale of alcohol in a store. It’s important to note that Georgia allows for the sale and consumption of alcohol in a bar, but you can’t purchase alcohol at a store on Sunday to be consumed in your home.  I scratch my head every time I write that… I can buy and drink in a bar, but not buy and drink at home… common sense out the window!

Why do I care about such a stupid issue, especially when I don’t drink and we are in an economic financial hysteria right now? It’s principle.

On February 7th I read the Facebook Post of Georgia State Senator Judson Hill, he commented on his opposition of Senate Bill 10 which allows counties the right to have voters vote on authorizing package sales by a retailer on Sundays. He’s a Republican and in my opinion, a good guy. I met Senator Hill on multiple occasions during election rallies where we both spoke about “Limited Government”, “The Constitution” and “What our Founding Fathers Believed in”.

Here’s his post –

I could not believe my eyes; a State Senator actually wrote that he stood with one religion to oppose Sunday sales. My mind raced and I recalled the fundamentals of why the Founding Fathers of the United States stood firm in the values of Judeo-Christian beliefs. Judeo-Christian beliefs being the basis of free will, liberty and a perfect picture of two different religions being respected and living harmoniously. The pure belief that one religion should not trump or rule another, that legislators do not discriminate or legislate based upon one religion.

I was proud that Governor Deal was quoted as saying that he would sign the Sunday Sales Bill and allow the voters to decide on the local level. It makes sense and after years of what I believe to be non-rational excuses, we had a Governor who believed in limited government and would allow voters to decide in their own communities. My pride was broken on February 23rd while listening to an interview with Russ Spencer of Fox 5 News and Governor Deal. The governor says he won’t be disappointed if the Senate bill remains stalled in committee and never gets to his desk.  A VERY DIFFERENT picture painted instantly, a behind closed door game and political double talk exposed. A newly elected Republican governor caught in double talk and not supporting the “limited government” stance we Republicans so proudly speak.

As I stood at the Sunday Sales rally on February 23rd I listened as activists and legislators called for limiting government, allowing local control, choice, and freedom from one religion over another. It reminded me of the 2010 election but my gut wrenched as I heard the name of another opposing the bill. “It’s stuck in rules committee, even though Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers supports and is co-sponsor of the bill, he can’t move it forward because he does not have the Republican votes. Senator Shafer is opposing the bill and is herding the other Republicans.”   And all this time I thought it was Senator Hill herding the charge to block the bill.

This morning, February 24th, I spoke to Senator David Shafer on, and off, the record. Needless to say I was disappointed to hear that yes, four years ago his committee gave a “do pass” to the bill, but he no longer supports the bill because the errors he corrected four years ago are back. Here is his official statement.

“Senate Bill 10 is flawed in its current form.  Local communities should determine the hours of alcohol sales, but the bill would mandate alcohol sales until 11:30 p.m. on Sundays.  Many communities end alcohol sales earlier than 11:30 p.m. during the week.  It does not make sense to have longer hours on Sunday than any other day of the week or to remove local option for that day only.

If we expand weekend alcohol sales, we should couple it with tougher penalties on the sale of alcohol to the underaged.

I have constituents and supporters on both sides of Sunday sales issue.  I have members of my own family on both sides of this issue.”

When asked about his relationship with the Georgia Alcohol Dealers who oppose the bill and specifically Richard Tucker, who is the owner of a beverage superstore, Senator Shafer stated that Mr. Tucker is no longer a constituent and he moved outside of his district. That did not answer my question of speculation and rumors of the driving force behind his opposition being Richard Tucker and the Georgia Alcohol Dealers.

When asked if there was any data supporting the need to increase penalties on under-aged sales, meaning data showing under-aged kids purchasing on weekends, he only had data attesting to kids being in school during the week. I guess as a legislator, I expect facts to be presented on why more legislation is actually needed. There are already laws against selling alcohol to minors.

I also challenged the “hours of operation” statement knowing the bill states “may authorize package sales by a retailer of malt beverages and wine on Sundays from 12:30 P.M. until 11:30 P.M.”  I explained I read that as a window of time that a private retailer could sale beer and wine. However, Senator Shafer still provided the above statement. “May” means “to be allowed or permitted to” and “to use to indicate a certain measure of likelihood or possibility” it is not a mandate and common sense dictates that private businesses have the ability to open during those hours but are not required to.

I like Senator David Shafer and think he’s also a good guy, however I’m disappointed that he is not living up to the fundamental principle of limited government and is not taking a leadership position to help herd other Republicans to follow through on the limited government principle we Republicans so often speak of.

I’m sad to report that our Governor, Senator Judson Hill and Senator David Shafer are Republicans who in my mind have gone wrong on this issue and have placed either Big Government or Religion over the ability for the will of the people.

Again, why bother with this issue? Principle and Accountability.

Dear Teacher Union Protesters

Dear Teacher Union Protesters,

Protest on your OWN time, not on time that you are paid by Tax Dollars and not on time that you are supposed to be teaching kids! Your behavior is wrong and you are demonstrating a huge lack of judgment.

Teachers who have turned in doctors’ notes saying you are “sick” and are protesting be advised that your employment is terminated for cause. Cause of termination is dishonesty. Your behavior is unacceptable and the example you are setting for kids is wrong.  After all, you would give a child a “zero” on assignments if they skipped class or detention for skipping class.

Protesting for your rights to retain collective bargaining with your union is acceptable behavior and your right. However, protesting during the time in which you are to be instructing the children of the taxpayers is not acceptable.

Return to work immediately or be prepared to have disciplinary action taken, including the option of terminating your contract of employment.

Regards,

The Tax Payer

39 Yea Right!

It’s not the morality issue I have with Representative Christopher Lee, in fact let me say it – “Congressman, go ahead, once out of office, lie, tell women your 39 (LOL), get a divorce, find someone to rock your world, post a full body shot! I don’t care, it is not my place to judge you.”

Congressman and those reading this who’s jaws just hit the table – did you catch it? “Once out of office!”  Why? Those who run for office accept, or should accept, that they are held to a higher standard. Once elected into Congress focus must be and maintained on matters of the greatest importance to our Nation. An individual riddled with ethics and a wife holding a gun to their privates does not have the ability to provide the focus needed to hold these positions.

In a time when our Nation is engaged in multiple wars, high unemployment, and attempts of fundamental changes, each elected official must hold themselves to a higher standard and stay focused on upholding the oath that each have taken.

“I, (name of Member), do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Hiding lies is a distraction, one that distracts from ones ability to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against the constant attacks from enemies, foreign and domestic.  Time spent covering up unethical tracks and private lives is time when one is unable to respond to the needs of those they have been elected to represent.

Oh and you Democrats out there celebrating, not so quick. I’ve never been so proud to be a Republican. When Speaker Boehner said he has zero tolerance for bad conduct, he meant it and is doing what he said. Democrats will always have to live with former Speaker Pelosi tolerating and “toning down” the ramped ethical issues that continue to plague the Democrat party. Need I remind you of Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel, Stanford Bishop, and even former President Bill Clinton? All Democrats that have had unethical or immoral behavior swept under a Congressional rug by the Pelosi broom and all individuals who still serve (except for President Clinton) thinking they are above the American people.

Hats off to Speaker Boehner for being a real leader.

Soapboxes

How many soapboxes can I possibly have and stand on at one time? As many as it takes to hold people accountable and uphold the liberties and freedom of my Country. Lately I have more boxes than I would like, simply because individuals are attempting to strip liberties away, one by one in the name of “conservatism”, “equality”, or worst yet, in the name of “God”.

It was John Adams who said “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds” I can only imagine the soapboxes that John Adams spoke on so many years ago. If he were alive today my bet is he would have many of the same boxes.

Our Founding Fathers provided a governing structure and definition of power within the Constitution. But they did not tell us how a moral life within our Country should be led. Why? Our Founding Fathers hoped that we would uphold the Constitution and live our lives according to Judeo-Christian values. Values that are based upon free will and man’s ability to do what is right and follow the teachings of the Jewish prophets and the teachings of Christ – NOT the laws governing the land.  Values that were not identical, but promoted the collective and common concept of liberty.

The Constitution does not deal with or dictate morality, in fact it provides for freedom of religion, meaning freedom of belief and freedom of worship with the absence of any state-sponsored religion.  We have freedom of religion that promotes and complements the Founding Fathers belief of free will and individual accountability.  The concept of legislating social morality and conformity is not what America stands for, and is actually an Eastern belief.

It is a slippery slope when we allow one religion to dictate or base legislation on one religion over another. When religious zealots use claims of “Judeo-Christian” in their calls for social morality, they are fighting against the core value and fundamental beliefs of our Founding Fathers.

It is the fault of individual men, not government, for the stripping away of certain religious references and the presence of God in our daily lives.  It is the lack of faith and strength to stand up and shout on a liberty soapbox.

If our Country became even more lost and was overtaken by the Muslim extremist, how would these same zealots argue against the majority wanting Sharia Law?

I am a Christian, but our Country is a melting pot with fundamental beliefs that are being stripped away and we are giving our liberties and will to the government.  It is wrong doing so in the name of God or in the name of equality.

Conservatives and Republicans must stand strong on our call for limited government, promoting individual accountability. If we do not and allow ourselves to be pulled into the “social morality” realm, we are no better than those calling for government control in the name of equality.

Freedom of Speech

This is worth posting! Read all the way to the bottom :-)

SIGN IN A BUSINESS WINDOW, IN ST. LOUIS, MO. !!!!

“WE WOULD RATHER DO BUSINESS WITH
1000 AL QAIDA TERRORISTS THAN WITH
ONE SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER!”

This sign was prominently displayed in the window of a business in St. Louis , MO and you are probably outraged at the thought of such an inflammatory sign.

However, we are a society which holds Freedom of Speech as perhaps one of our greatest liberties.

And after all, it is only a sign, right? …. keep scrolling…

You may ask : “What kind of business would dare post such a sign?” ….. keep scrolling….

Answer: A Funeral Home
(Who said morticians had no sense of humor?)

You gotta love it!!!
God Bless The United States , and keep our Troops Safe and Well.